Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts

A rich man called John DUNN, 1854 and a poor man called John DUNN, 1871

Rich men: John DUNN sr (MLC, banker) and John DUNN jnr (MP Dartmouth UK)
Poor man: John DUNN(e) aka James DEMPSEY (prisoner, larceny, forgery)
Mock the French: Camille del Sarte's arrival at Hobart from Paris



The Legislative Council Chamber today, where John Dunn's dinner was held, 17 March 1854
Copyright © Parliament of Tasmania
Link: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/legislative-council

John Dunn snr, MLC & John Dunn jnr, MP
Biography: https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/dunn-john-2009

On the 17th March, 1854, Captain Edward Goldsmith attended a farewell dinner to John Dunn (snr, 1790–1861), elected member of the City Council, who was returning temporarily to England on the Antipodes by reason of his wife's ill health. Various speeches delivered by attendees made reference to the end of convict transportation to the colony of Van Diemen's Land a year earlier; to the need for land grants as enticement to immigrants; and to the question of labourers acquiring agricultural land. In his own speech, John Dunn made reference to his support for the Dock Bill which would have had an impact on Captain Goldsmith's shipwright and patent slip construction. The comments regarding a "little foreign gentleman" which raised laughter were possibly directed at Monsieur Camille Del Sarte, a recently arrived musician from Paris. John Dunn snr died in Hobart in 1861. His son John Dunn jnr, M.P. for Dartmouth (UK), died of heat stroke on board the Mail Steamer in the Red Sea on the voyage to Hobart, reported by the Hobart Town Advertiser, 15 October 1860, page 2.

This vivid account, virtuosic in detail, of the dinner held to farewell John Dunn snr on his visit to England was published by the Hobart Courier, Monday, 20th March 1854:

TRANSCRIPT

FAREWELL DINNER TO MR. DUNN.
One hundred and four gentlemen, who, if all electors, would form the proportion of about 8 per cent, of those who profess to be Mr. Dunn's solo constituents, or not one-twentieth of the whole body of city electors, attended a dinner given to him on Friday evening last, at the Legislative Council Chamber, previous to his departure for England by the Antipodes. The dinner was conducted in excellent style, and the whole company appeared to enjoy the delicacies provided, and the abundance of champagne and other wines by which they were accompanied, with the utmost zest. At each end of the room and at the entrance were placed inscriptions in honour of Mr. Dunn; while a large banner, bearing the Tasmanian Arms, floated over the Chair, which was occupied by Alexander Orr, Esq.

The chamber-band of the 99th was in attendance, and accompanied the several toasts with appropriate airs. The health of Mr. John Dunn was followed by a piece of music, composed, at two-hours' notice, expressly for the occasion by Mr. Martin, the band-master. The new service of place, used for the first time at the dinner given to Mr, Hathaway, was also placed in requisition; and nothing in short was omitted that could contribute to the success of the proceedings and the satisfaction of all parties, officially or otherwise, connected with them. Among the guests of the evening, R Dry, Esq., Speaker of the Legislative Council, had been invited, but in consequence of indisposition was compelled to decline. Among the gentlemen present were Colonel Last, Drs. Bedford, Hadley, Brock, Crooke, and Rev. Dr. Fry ; the Attorney and Solicitor-General, Mr. Justice Horne, Robert Power, Esq., His Worship the Mayor, C. B. Brewer, Esq., R. Lewis, Esq., Rev. Mr. Buckland, Edward Macdowell, Esq., Captain Goldsmith, Messrs. Worley, Reeves, Guesdon, Meikle, Harbottle, Champion, Hamilton, Basstian, &

During the evening a letter was read by the Chairman from Colonel Despard, also an invited guest, in which that gentleman expressed his regret at being prevented by illness attending the occasion.

After the customary loyal toasts had been given and duly honoured, the Chairman gave "Our guest, John Dunn, Jun. Esq.," and observed that he did so with mingled feelings of pain mid pleasure; of pain, on account of the domestic affliction which compelled his absence; of pleasure, because those who supported him in his election, and who represented the wealth, influence, and respectability of the colony were there. assembled to do him honour. He felt but too happy to notice that scarcely a single individual had expressed disapprobation at Mr. Dunn's leaving for a short time. In order to ensure his return as soon as possible, he had taken his passage by the overland route; but should any unforeseen cause of delay occur, he ( Mr. Orr) felt assured that the kind feeling shown would induce him to rejoin them as soon as possible. He had observed that about 800 persons had signed an address to Mr. McNaughtan, expressing the opinion that if Mr. Dunn should retire, Mr. McNaughtan was a fit person to represent the city. He (Mr. Orr) had been made the subject of some remarks in one of the colonial papers, which remarks he could afford to pass over with supreme contempt. There was in the community a little foreign gentleman, who exercised a greater degree of liberty than the inhabitants themselves; if it were not for that little firebrand, all would be united into a happy family. (Great laughter.) In his own country he had observed, no doubt, a small combustible called an " allumette ;" and although himself a very small spark, if he could only get any one to blow the bellows, he would blow them all up. (Continued laughter.) He did not believe there was one man in Hobart Town who really would desire Mr. Dunn's retirement; but even if Mr. Dunn were to resign, he (Mr. Orr) was quite convinced that his re-election would be certain. After making some further allusions to Mr. Dunn's public and private character, and many hopes for his safe passage to England and the restoration to health of Mrs.Dunn, the toast was given and responded to with great and general acclamation,' an additional cheer' being elicited by the sentiment, " A happy"and a quick return."

Mr. Dunn, when some degree of silence was obtained, acknowledged the compliment with much apparent emotion. On the eve of departure, he had had to transact business with more than 300 people. The manner in which his health had been proposed and received was highly gratifying ; and equally so was it to meet so many of his constituents, and to receive such proofs of their approbation. For more than two years he had had the honour of being their representative, and had ever endeavoured, concientiously and honestly, to do his duty. When he entered the Council, he did so free, unfettered, and untrammelled, excepting only on the question of transportation. In redeeming his pledge on that question, he did not deem it his duty to infuse it with every other question that might emanate from the Government. In supporting the Dock Bill, he did so in behalf of the public at large, and therefore he supported it at the best of his ability ; and he believed that many who formerly opposed that measure were now fully convinced that it ought to have been carried; the principal merchants, the majority of the shipowners, the most influential inhabitants, in short, of Hobart Town, were in favour of it, and it was rejected as being some way connected with the transportation question! Respecting the vote of want of confidence in Sir Wm. Denison, while he deprecated his conduct on the subject of transportation, he could not " go the whole hog" in abusing him.... etc etc
Source: The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859) Mon 20 Mar 1854 Page 2 FAREWELL DINNER TO MR. DUNN.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2243886
Obituary: THE LATE JOHN DUNN, ESQ. (1861, January 23). The Cornwall Chronicle (Launceston, Tas.), p. 3.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article65567682

One piece of land held by John Dunn in New Town was later known as the Old Race Course and included Sunderland St., Derwent Park Rd, Main Rd and Main Line railway.



Map - Buckingham 33 - plan of an estate belonging to John Dunn, New Town, New Town Rvt,
Hobart to Launceston road, race course
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania ADRI: AF396-1-36
Series: County Maps, 1810 - 1959 (AF396)

John Dunn, forger
This prisoner's mugshot was taken at the Hobart Gaol on incarceration in 1873 by commercial photographer and government contractor Thomas J. Nevin. It was reprinted on the prisoner's discharge in 1875, each print numbered verso for the Municipal Police Photo Books as "13 & 11".

In the late 1890s to the mid 1910s, this mugshot and more than 300 similar prisoner photographs were salvaged from inactive police and prison records by convictarian John Watt Beattie for display and sale to local and intercolonial tourists at his “Port Arthur Museum” located at 51 Murray Street, Hobart. To cater to his visitors’ adventures in dark tourism, especially for those seeking photographs of their criminal ancestors, he wrote the man’s name, his ship and the factually incorrect phrase “Taken at Port Arthur 1874” on the versos of hundreds of these cdv’s, some of which he reprinted and housed in alphabetical order in family albums. Film production on site at Port Arthur of two versions in 1909 and 1929 of Marcus Clarke’s novel For the Term of His Natural Life (1874) offered the tourist an opportunity to witness filming and even participate as extras. On Beattie’s death in 1930, at least three hundred of these prisoner mugshots from the 1870s, both original duplicates and later copies of the 1870s originals, were acquired by the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Launceston (Tas).

Fifty or so cdv's from Beattie's collection of Tasmanian "convict portraits" (as these photographs became known in the 20th century when exhibited on the walls of museum and art galleries) were removed from the QVMAG, Launceston in 1983 for display as part of the Port Arthur Development Project (at the former prison south of Hobart) and not returned. They were each numbered on the mount for relocation - for example, John Dunn's cdv was numbered "48" - and deposited instead at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Hobart.



Recto inscription: number "48"
Prisoner John DUNN alias James DEMPSEY
Photographed by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol 1873-75
TMAG Ref: Q15585




Verso inscriptions: Numbers" 13 & 11"
"John Dunn alias Dempsey per Hydrabad 3"
"Taken at Port Arthur 1874" [incorrect]
Photographed by government contractor Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol 1873-75
TMAG Ref: Q15585


Transportation and police records
John Dunn per Hydrabad 3 was 22 years old, a Roman Catholic, literate and with no previous convictions when he was imprisoned for stealing five heifers at Kildare, Ireland in March 1849. He was transported for 10 years in 1850 to the penal colony of Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania). In 1853 he received a ticket of leave, and a conditional pardon in 1854.



Name: Dunne, John
Record Type: Convicts
Departure date: 13 Sep 1850
Departure port: Queenstown
Ship: Hyderabad (3)
Voyage number: 332
Index number: 20661
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1389265
Archives Office Tasmania

1849-1854: John Dunn and James Dempsey
In 1854, John Dunn may have used the name of a fellow prisoner from Kildare, James Dempsey, as an alias for the purposes of obtaining work as a seaman in order to leave the colony for Melbourne. Both Dunn and Dempsey were from Kildare, both were sentenced on the same date, 10th March 1849, and both were transported for 10 years, though Dempsey travelled on the London (2).

1871-1875: John Dunn alias James Dempsey
Nothing further was heard from John Dunn until he was sentenced on 28 December 1871 to 4 years for uttering a forged cheque. The press reported the case briefly on 10 Nov 1871 in this article:

TRANSCRIPT

POLICE COURT. LAUNCESTON. Wednesday 8th Nov., 1871
(Before Thomas Mason Esq. P. M.)
FORGERY.— John Dunne alias James Dempsey was brought up on remand from the 1st instant, charged with uttering a forged cheque for £6 13s 10d.
Mr Robert George Horne of Deloraine deposed that he had no account at the Commercial Bank, and the signature "Robert Horne" to the cheque for £6 13s 10d produced was not his, he signed "R. G. Horne"; the prisoner's face was familiar to him but he knew no more of him than that; he found the prisoner had been in his employ at sometime or other.
Mr Ritchard Thompson, assistant in the shop of Messrs. Farrelly Brothers, deposed that the prisoner tendered the cheque to him on the 27th October in payment for goods selected, to the amount of 34s; the cheque purported to be signed by Robert Horne in favour of James Dempsey; asked him if it was Robert Horne of Deloraine and prisoner said "yes"; Mr B Farrelly took the cheque to make enquries and while he was away the prisoner went several times to the door and left before Mr Farrelly returned; he had never seen the prisoner before that day.
Mr J. Lagor deposed that the prisoner called at his shop on the 27th October and wanted to buy two shirts and a pair of trousers, and to pay by a cheque for £5.9s, purporting to have been signed by Robert Horne, and drawn in favor of James Dempsey. He did not like the look of the cheque and gave it back to the prisoner.
Mr. Cathcart deposed that there was no person by the name of Horne who had an account at the Commercial Bank on the 27th October.
Serg. Coghlan in his evidence detailed how he, with District Constable Murphy, had traced the prisoner to a hut at Piper River and had arrested him there. He denied having been to Messrs Farrelly's establishment buying clothes.
The prisoner said he had nothing to say at present and no witnesses to call.
He was then committed for trial.
Source: Cornwall Chronicle (Launceston, Tas.), Friday 10 November 1871, page 2
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article67111798

John Dunn aka James Dempsey was arrested for trying to to buy two shirts and a pair of trousers with cheques forged with his former employer's signature. When he was arrested he was wearing "a diagonal ribbed blue sacque coat, grey striped trousers, and black hat." The sacque coat, fashionable in the 1860s-70s was so-called because it was loose-fitting, but by the 1880s to 1900s coats and matching trousers became narrowly-fitted, cut closer to the body. This example of a loose-fitting sacque coat was worn by Mr Wright, a Templar, when he posed standing next to Thomas J. Nevin's big table-top stereograph viewer, ca. 1870.



Subject: A Loyal United Lodge member in ceremonial apron with a gold medal on lapel, perhaps Mr. Wright visiting from Brisbane, 1870 for the Lodge anniversary
Posed with hand resting on Nevin's table top stereograph viewer
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin, 140 Elizabeth St; Hobart
Details: hand tinted carte-de-visite placed inside an album leaf frame
Copyright © The Lucy Batchelor Collection 2009 (scans courtesy of the Bishop family)


Warrant and arrest: police gazette notices



TRANSCRIPT

LAUNCESTON. - On the 28th ultimo, by Thomas Mason, Esq., J. P. , for the arrest of James Depmsey, charged with having on the 27th ultimo, at Launceston, feloniously uttered a certain forged order for the payment of £6.13s.10d., with intent to defraud.

Description
About 35 years old, 5 feet 6 or 7 inches high, fresh complexion, fair hair; wore a diagonal ribbed blue sacque coat, grey striped trousers, and black hat.



Warrant for arrest of John Dunn, known to police only as James Dempsey on 3 November 1871:

TRANSCRIPT
James Dempsey, proper name Dunne, per Hydrabad 2, has been arrested by D. C. Murphy and Sergeant Coghlan, of the Selby Territorial Police.
Proper name John Dunne (e), arrest published in the police gazette the same day, 3 Nov 1871.
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police, J. Barnard, Gov't printer

John Dunn was sent to the Port Arthur prison on 17 February 1872. Nearly two years later, he was transferred to the House of Corrections, Hobart Gaol on 29 December 1873 where he was photographed by government contractor T. J. Nevin. On the 7 June 1875 John Dunn "or James Dempsey" was discharged from Hobart, the residue of his four year sentence remitted.



John Dunn as James Dempsey
Discharged 11 June 1875
Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime for Police, J. Barnard Gov't Printer

John Dunn or James Dempsey per Hydrabad 3 was sentenced on 28 December 1871 to 4 years for uttering a forged cheque. When he was discharged from the Hobart Gaol on 11th June 1875, this police gazette notice recorded his native place as Kildare (Ireland), his age at 41 yrs old, height at 5 feet 5 inches in height, with brown hair and a scar on forehead. He was FS (free in servitude).

He was charged with being drunk and incapable at Launceston on 1 Feb 1876 and fines 10/s
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article37139448

On 25 August 1881 he was tried for larceny at the Supreme Court Launceston. This record makes no mention of his alias "James Dempsey" although it was recorded by police by the time he was discharged in 1875.

1881: John Dunn(e)
In 1881 John Dunn was sentenced to 12 months for larceny at the Supreme Court Launceston (Tas), and discharged on 8 October 1882.

The press reported the incident which led to the charge, the trial and sentencing:

TRANSCRIPT
Larceny as a Bailee.-John Dunne alias Dempsey was brought up on remand, charged with having, on the night of the 2nd inst., appropriated to his own use £25, entrusted to his charge by Charles Booth Bartley.
Charles Booth Bartley, a miner, deposed that on'the 2nd of June he left Launceston on  his way to the Denison gold diggings; on the road he called in at the Junction Inn; shortly after witness arrived the prisoner came in ; witness knew him, as he had formerly worked as a carpenter for his (witness's) brother; previous to retiring to bed witness gave the prisoner £25 in notes to take charge of ; there was four £5 notes and five £1 notes in the bundle; a man named Knight was in the room when witness gave the accused the money; the landlord of the inn was absent when the cash was entrusted to Dunne's charge, but he returned some time afterwards, and witness informed him of what he had done; subsequently he asked the prisoner for the money back, in order to deliver it over to the care of the land- lord ; he refused to do so, remarking it would be as safe with him as in charge of the landlord; witness did not press the request, as he had every confidence in him; in the morning he discovered the accused had gone during the night, taking the money with him.
To the prisoner - Recollected the money being placed in a box, and may have objected to its being put there ; did not remember stuffing the sum into prisoner's boots for safety.
By the Bench - Could not swear whether or not the accused was suffering from delirium tremens, but he appeared in his sober senses.
James Knight, a farmer, residing at Piper River, remembered being at the Junction Inn on the 2nd inst; the prisoner was there, and witness saw Mr Bartley give him some money to take care of until the next morning ; was not aware what the amount was, but heard it was £25 ; witness slept in the same room as the prisoner that night; some time in the night he heard Dunne asking for matches, and when witness awoke in the morning he was gone.
Robert Smiley, landlord of the Junction Inn, deposed that the prisoner entered his service on the 11th May and left on the 2nd inst. ; remembered Mr Bartley asking him to witness his giving the money in charge to the prisoner ; heard Dunne say he could keep the money as well as the landlord could; he was employed by witness as a rough carpenter, and had not half completed his contract when he left.
The prisoner was committed to take his trial at the next sittings of the Supreme Court.

Source: LAUNCESTON POLICE COURT. (1881, June 28). Launceston Examiner (Tas), p. 3.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article38223806

John Dunn was admitted to the Launceston Invalid Depot and discharged at his own request in 1888.
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Digital/POL709-1-22/POL709-1-22_1888p173

Death not recorded.



Dunne, John
Record Type: Court
Status: Free by servitude
Trial date: 1 Jul 1881
Place of trial: Launceston
Offense: Larceny
Verdict: Guilty
Prosecutions Project ID: 119242
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1589083
Archives Office Tasmania

RELATED POSTS main weblog

Hobart Gaol camera and mugshot books 1891-1901







Marion's Excelsior Camera, 22 & 23 Soho Sq., London W 1,
The firm operated from this address between c.1866 - 1913.
Held at the Penitentiary Chapel Historic Site, Campbell St. Hobart, Tasmania, site of the former Hobart Gaol and Supreme Court.
Photos copyright © KLW NFC 2015 ARR

This camera was used by the (as yet) unidentified photographer at the Hobart Gaol from the 1890s. Prior to the 1890s, prisoners were photographed by Constable John Nevin who was resident at the Gaol until his death from typhoid fever in 1891, working with his brother, commercial photographer and civil servant Thomas J. Nevin who attended the gaol and Supreme Court Oyer and Terminer sessions on a weekly roster. They used two rooms above the women's laundry as a studio. The cameras they used were wet plate, multi-lens cameras such as the 1860s American Scovill (possibly Peck) style wet-plate camera with four Darlot No.4 lenses, a Simon Wing 'Repeating' camera, or a stereoscopic, sliding box type, wet plate (wood, brass & glass), by Ottewill & Co, lenses manufactured by A Ross, London, England, 1860 - 1870.



Advertisement for the Marion Excelsior Studio Camera 1898, available in 9½, 12 and 15 square formats. with repeating single dark slide, extra front and all carriers with double extension, priced from  £5.5 to £13.10.

Sources: https://archive.org/stream/1898britishjourn00londuoft#page/10/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/1898britishjourn00londuoft

Photographing prisoners was a laughing matter in 1895
During the famous Conlan case of 1895, in which a scam and fraud was attempted on the estate of an old ex-convict John Conlan who had lived life as a pauper but died apparently having hoarded a small fortune, the attention of Parliament was drawn to the irregular presence of newspaper photographers from the Tasmanian Mail taking photographs of the four accused inside the court room.  The Attorney-General's response was that he had given the press permission, although his recall about the details was hazy, and asserted in any case, that the taking of photographs of persons arrested both before conviction and after it was customary. The objection to being photographed before he was found guilty had been raised by one of the accused, John Marchant Frazer of California, arrested on suspicion, found guilty in the course of events, and sentenced to six years' imprisonment at the Hobart Gaol.  The concerns voiced in Parliament regarding the impropriety of photographing persons both innocent and under suspicion, as well as the disregard of personal privacy and the potential harm to personal reputation, was punctuated with a some very witty comments and loud outbursts of laughter.  This transcript of the session gives a very clear idea of how commonplace the photographic image had become for the police and judiciary by 1895.

FOR ADJOURNMENT.
"THE TASMANIAN" IN PARLIAMENT.
TAKING PHOTOGRAPHS IN THE POLICE COURT.
Mr. W. T. H. BROWN, having been granted leave to ask a question without notice, said he had noticed in the evening paper that when the Conlan will case was called on at the Police Court that morning, "Mr. Winch remarked, that there was a gentleman in the court with a camera, for the purpose of taking photographs of the accused and he objected to it." (Laughter.)
The Police Magistrate said it was by the order of the Attorney-General. (Loud laughter.) It might be a laughing matter to some, but it was not so to those concerned. The prisoner Frazer said he "objected to having his photograph taken before he was found guilty. " The Police Magistrate subsequently said that to have a camera in the court was most unseemly, and if the Attorney General was there he thought he would not allow it. Mr. Winch asked that if the photograph had been taken it should be de- tained in court. Now he would like an answer from the Attorney-General as to whether any gentleman, especially if he was connected with the press, had the right to go to the Police Court to take a photograph of anyone charged on suspicion as a guilty person.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL: Permission was asked for, and granted by me. It is the custom to photograph persons arrested both before conviction and after it.
Mr. URQUHART : It's a piece of cheekiness.
Mr. BROWN : I think it time such a practice was put an end to.
Mr. URQUHART moved the adjournment of the House in order that the matter might be discussed. He thought such a practice might result in innocent persons being ruined. He was not aware there was any law by which photographs could be taken in this way. When a man was found guilty he was in the hands of the gaol officials but not before. Many a man was arrested on an unfounded suspicion, and he would like to know why there should remain in the hands of the gaol officials an imprint of that man's features. It was highly derogatory to the administration of justice that photographers should be allowed into the Police Court to take photographs.
Mr. MULCAHY: It does not hurt them. (Laughter.)
The PREMIER could not say what harm could arise from an innocent man having his photograph taken. They all had their photographs taken all their lives, and sometimes without permission. (Laughter). He would second the motion for the sake of discussion, because he was sure the Hon. member would withdraw it when he was told that this was a practice not peculiar to Tasmania -( laughter)-but common throughout a considerable portion of the world. The practice was, after all, a very harmless one, and the use of a camera did not make a man guilty.
Mr. BROWN: Sometimes it does. (Laughter.)
The PREMIER said that because a man's photograph was taken it did not pronounce that he had done anything wrong. In England judges on the bench were photographed.,
Mr. BROWN : Surreptitiously.
The PREMIER : Witnesses giving their evidence, the defendant, the prosecutor, jurors, barristers, and even the crier of the court, were photographed, and appeared in the illustrated papers, and no one ventured to say that any aspersion was cast on them because their photographs were published. Lots of persons spent large sums of money in being photographed, and some of them were innocent persons. (Laughter.)
Mr. BROWN said that was a very different thing from holding innocent persons up to public condemnation. No man's likeness should be taken as a prisoner until he was found guilty. So long as he was an innocent man let him remain so. He hoped steps would be taken to prevent anything of the kind in the future.
Mr. MULCAHY said that he agreed with the police magistrate, that it was unseemly to take the photograph of a prisoner in court, otherwise he could not say that there was any great grievance.
Mr. W. T. H. BROWN : I hope you won't be brought up on suspicion. (Laughter.)
Mr. MULCAHY: I should not regard being photographed as a grievance at all.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL: I gave permission to take photographs of the four accused. I did not know when or where, and I did not think it would matter much. I do not want to create any unseemly scenes in the Police Court, and I do not apprehend that there was one. I am sorry to hear that in the opinion of the Police Magistrate an unseemly incident occurred.
Mr. MACKENZIE thought it was in the interests of justice that the men should be photographed, because if they were on bail they might bolt, and the colony might lose their pictures altogether. (Loud laughter.)
The motion for adjournment was put and negatived.
Source: FOR ADJOURNMENT. (1895, July 13). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 1 Supplement: The Mercury Supplement. Retrieved June 8, 2015, from https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article9305012



Source: National Library of Australia
James Conlaw, per Hydrabad 3, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [picture] [ sic-incorrect information - Connnelly, Hobart Gaol]
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-142915915Call Number PIC Album 935 #P1029/5

Prisoner John Conlan, also known as James Conlan (mispelt as Conlaw at the NLA where this mugshot is held) was photographed by T. J. Nevin on 16th December 1874 at the Hobart Gaol when Conlan was discharged from a four year sentence for larceny. He lived as a pauper but was believed to have hoarded a fortune on his death. One of two fraudulent claimants who forged the will, James Marchant Frazer, received a sentence of six years for forgery on 26th July 1895.





Prisoner James Marchant Frazer 1895 objected to being photographed
Mugshots attached to his criminal record sheet
TAHO Ref: GD6312 Page1308

Michael Wm or Maurice Walch 1893-1935
The Marion Excelsior camera was used by the visiting photographer to the Hobart Gaol to photograph this Huon resident and recidivist, Michael William Walch in 1909 for his front and profile pair of mugshots, pasted at lower centre of page, and if still in use in 1935 at the Gaol, for the trio of a full-length photograph, a full frontal photograph, and the small profile photograph of Michael Walch who by that date had changed his middle name from William to Maurice (lower left of rap sheet.). In 1906 and 1935 he was arrested for the same offence of exposing himself. The earliest mugshots at right were taken in 1893 when he was 23 years old on being sentenced at the Supreme Court Hobart for common assault. By 1935 he would have been 65 years old when he was photographed at the Police Office Hobart in his three piece suit, shirt and tie, and hat. He served six months for indecent exposure. The full length photograph was introduced in the 1920s. For the most engaging police photographs in this genre, visit the NSW Justice and Police Museum mugshots page, especially the selection published by Peter Doyle. Crooks Like Us (2009),



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1

Thomas Clark 1897
A first offender, prisoner Thomas Clark and his co-arsonist George Campbell (see below), were sentenced to 4 years in 1896 but discharged in October 1897. The photographer applied the mugshot methods of Bertillon required by prison regulations by the 1890s in providing a pair of photographs, one full frontal and one in profile, but still printed both photographs in oval mounts typical of earlier commercial carte-de-visite production. Thomas Clark was photographed wearing the prison-issue houndstooth patterned tie with a shirt in the fortnight prior to discharge, but not the full prison uniform. The third photograph pasted to the bottom of his criminal sheet was taken on arrest, wearing the same collarless shirt and coat as his partner in crime, George Campbell, who was an inmate of the Boy's Training school when captured.



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1



George Campbell 1888 and 1897
These two photographs (Reg: 776) of prisoner George Campbell, one full frontal printed into an oval mount, the other in profile and unmounted, were taken a fortnight before he was discharged from the Hobart Gaol on 6th October 1897. Although appearing to wear civilian clothes, he was wearing the prison-issue houndstooth patterned tie on discharge. In 1888 he was sentenced to 4 years for larceny, and another 4 years for arson in 1896. He was sentenced for the same crime and on the same date as the prisoner Thomas Clark (see above), 24th March 1896. The third unmounted full frontal photograph pasted to the bottom of his rap sheet shows George Campbell as younger, thinner, and wearing his own shirt. It was probably taken on arrest while he was still at the Training School (Boys' Orphanage).



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1



Joshua Anson 1877 and 1897
Joshua Anson was indicted for feloniously stealing a quantity of photographic goods from his employer, H. H. Baily, photographer, of Hobart Town on May 31st, 1877. The charge was larceny as a servant. The prisoner pleaded not guilty. Despite the depositions of good character from photographer Samuel Clifford, Charles Walch the stationer, and W.R. Giblin, lawyer and Attorney-General, Joshua Anson (b. 1854, Hobart), was found guilty of stealing goods valued at £88, though the real value of the goods, which included camera equipment, negatives, paper, mounts, chemicals, tripods etc exceeded £140. He was sentenced to two years' imprisonment, with parole. On July 12, 1877, the Mercury reported that Joshua Anson's appeal was " to seek to retrieve his character by an honest career in another colony; and asked that during his incarceration he might be kept from the company of other prisoners as much as possible, though not, he said, on account of feeling himself above them, as the verdict of the jury removed that possibility." The seriousness of the crime warranted a 14 year sentence, but the jury strongly recommended him to mercy "on account of his youth".

Joshua Anson did not take the two photographs of himself that were pasted to his criminal sheet, the first (on left) in 1877 when he was 23 yrs old, and the second (on right) in 1897 when he was 43 yrs old, nor did he photograph any of the other prisoners for gaol records while serving time at the Hobart Gaol. His abhorrence of the company of convicts was extreme, as his statement testifies. His 1877 prisoner mugshot was taken by Constable John Nevin in situ, and unmounted. Thomas Nevin may have printed another for the Municipal Police Office Registry at the Town Hall, Macquaries St. Hobart where he was the Hall and Office Keeper, but it is yet to be identified among the Tasmanian prisoner cdvs held in public collections. Joshua Anson was certainly the beneficiary of Thomas Nevin's stock and commercial negatives when Samuel Clifford acquired them in 1876 and then sold them on to Joshua Anson and his brother Henry Anson in 1878. The Anson brothers reprinted Clifford & Nevin's Port Arthur stereoscopes for their highly commercial album, published in 1890 as Port Arthur Past and Present without due acknowledgement to either Nevin or Clifford.

The Launceston Examiner reported another theft by Joshua Anson on 30 May, 1896. The arrest, he was reported to have said, had brought on two epileptic fits. He was imprisoned again at the Hobart Gaol, served 12 months and discharged on 1st July 1897.



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1



TRANSCRIPT
HOBART, Friday
At the City Court to-day Joshua Anson, photographer, was charged with having robbed Charles Perkins of £32 12s5d. Accused, who was not represented by counsel, stated he had had two epileptic fits since he was arrested, and his head was not now clear. He asked for a remand. After the evidence of the prosecution had been taken, the accused was remanded till Tuesday.
Beautiful spring-like weather is prevailing.
Source; Launceston Examiner, 30 May, 1896

John Jones 1896
Both photographs taken of prisoner John Jones at the beginning and end of his sentence, June and December 1896, were vignetted (cloudy background) and posed in full frontal gaze. He was photographed as clean shaven with closely cropped hair in the first, taken on incarceration for being idle etc, and again  six months later, in the fortnight before being discharged, with full beard, more hair, and still wearing the prison-issue tie. The discharge photo was registered No. 685.



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1

George Davis 1895
A single photograph in semi profile, with the registration number 560 was taken at the Police Office, Hobart where prisoner George Davis was repeatedly detained for short sentences from 14 days to three months. For some reason, the Hobart Gaol header on this form has been taped over. The prison scarf or tie worn during these last years of the 19th century featured a large lozenge pattern.



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1

James Connolly 1876, 1883 and 1895
Thomas Nevin photographed this prisoner James Connolly (or Conly) at the Hobart Gaol on being transferred from Port Arthur on 29th November 1876, per this record, the Conduct PA Register Con 94-1-2 1873-76 (State Library Tasmania)



Transfer of prisoner James Connolly from Port Arthur to the Hobart Gaol, photographed there by T. J. Nevin on being received, 29th November 1876. Source: Conduct PA Register Con 94-1-2 1873-76 Archives Office Tasmania





Prisoner James Connolly was photographed in November 1876 by Thomas Nevin at the Hobart Gaol (QVMAG Collection: Ref. No.Q1985_p_0086).





Photocopy of the QVMAG cdv held at the Archives Office Tasmania, Hobart, of prisoner James Connolly, photographed in November 1876 by Thomas Nevin at the Hobart Gaol (P30/1/3231). 

This rap sheet (below), held at the Hobart Gaol and Municipal Police Office, Town Hall, shows a summary of James Connolly's criminal history from transportation in 1852 for stealing a watch to his last offense - being idle - in 1899 when he was transferred to the Invalids Depot at Launceston where he died in 1900. The photograph pasted to this rap sheet was taken by Thomas Nevin in 1883 on James Connolly's sentence at the Supreme Court Hobart for the axe murder of Constable William Thompson. His sentence - to be hanged - was commuted to life in prison.



Inquest for the axe murder of Constable William Thompson 17 Feb 1883
James Connolly committed for trial. Source: Tasmanian Reports of Crime



Prisoner James Connolly 1883: photo by T. J. Nevin, detail of rap sheet below

Note the pencilled reference to the earlier photograph of prisoner James Connolly taken by Thomas Nevin in 1876 - For Photo see Photo Book No. 1 p. 54 - next to the boxed word "Sentence". Duplicates from Nevin's glass negatives of these sittings with prisoners dating from the early 1870s onwards were kept at the Municipal Police Office, Town Hall and Hobart Gaol where they were collated into separate mugshot albums, designated and sequenced as "PHOTO BOOK No. 1..." etc.



Archives Office Tasmania
Connolly, James
Record Type:Prisoners
Year:1883
Record ID:NAME_INDEXES:1486139
Resource GD63/2/1 Page 7

This last photograph, a single full frontal image, registered as No. 503, was taken at the Hobart Gaol on James Connolly's transfer to the New Town Invalid Depot in July 1895. A short hand-written record of his criminal history was pasted over a duplicate of the first sheet.





Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1

Michael Charlton 1901
This record gives a registration number for the photograph - "B1". Prisoner Michael Charlton was convicted at the Police Office Hobart on 21st December 1900 and discharged on 5th January 1901, serving a sentence of three weeks at the Hobart Gaol for "obtaining passage by sea" which presumably meant he was caught as a stowaway. The two photographs, one full frontal, and one profile, were taken according to the Bertillon method in the same sitting on conviction at the Police Office, and printed with the date of the sitting "21-12-00" across the bottom of the photograph in profile. Extensively torn from use, and rotted from poor storage, the book was salvaged  from the Hobart Gaol, transferred to the Archives Office Tasmania in the 1950s. This buff coloured page was pasted onto the blue criminal record form used by the gaol, visible at the torn edges.



Source: Archives Office State Library of Tasmania
Mugshots 1891 GD67-1-10, 1895 GD128-1-2, 1901 GD128-1-1

ARCHIVES OFFICE TASMANIA
These mugshot books are held at the State Library and Archives Office of Tasmania.

Series Number: GD67
Title: PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF PRISONERS RECEIVED.
Start Date: 01 Jan 1860
End Date: 31 Dec 1936
Date Range of Holdings:
01 Jan 1860 to 31 Dec 1901
01 Jan 1934 to 31 Dec 1936
Access: Open
Creating Agency:
• TA31 GAOL (BRANCH) 01 Jan 1823 31 Dec 1936
• TA32 GAOL DEPARTMENT 01 Jan 1936 31 Dec 1959
Description (Content/Function):
Name, ship, trade, height, age, complexion, head, hair, whiskers, visage, forehead, eyebrows, eyes, nose, mouth, chin, native place; remarks: sometimes include - civil condition, clothing, family, offence, sentence, photograph.
System of Arrangement:
The relationship of these volumes to each other is somewhat obscure. There is considerable date overlap and some people are included in more than one volume. Each volume is arranged roughly chronologically. The situation is further confused by the fact that some volumes have been indexed at a later date and marked 'A', 'B', 'C' etc,. not all of these indexed volumes have survived. There is no indication as to why some were indexed and others not, as what differences there are between volumes which have been indexed are also apparent between some of those which have not been indexed. Indexed volumes are: c.1860-74 'A' GD67/1, 1862-66 'B' GD67/2, 1866-70 'C' GD67/4, 1870-77 'D' GD 67/5, c1874-86 'E' GD 67/7, c1884-91 'G' GD67/8, c1892-97 'H' GD 67/11, c1897-1901 'I' GD 67/12, c1934-36 'L' GD67/13 contained in (the back) GD67/7. Generally the same format as CON18.
Information Sources:
Controlling Series:
• GD68 INDEX TO PRISONERS DESCRIPTION RECORDS. 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1952
Related Series:
• GD128 PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD AND DESCRIPTION OF PRISONERS. 01 Jul 1895 30 Nov 1902
Items in Series:
• GD67/1/1 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/2 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/3 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/4 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/5 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/6 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/7 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/8 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/9 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/10 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/11 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/12 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
• GD67/1/13 Physical description of prisoners received 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1936
© State of Tasmania, Archives Office of Tasmania 2006



Photos copyright © KLW NFC 2015 ARR

Tasmanian crime statistics 1866-1875

MOVEMENT of PRISONERS Hobart-Port Arthur-Hobart 1871-1875
NEPOTISM and CORRUPTION: W.R. Giblin and A.H. Boyd
PHOTOGRAPHS of PRISONERS: Thomas J. Nevin 1873



Custom, and Parliament Houses Clifford, photo.
Author/Creator: Clifford, Samuel, 1827-1890.
Publication Information: 1862.
Physical description: 1 stereoscopic pair of photographs : sepia toned ; 7 x 7 cm. each.
In: Abbott album Item 41

Tables published in Parliamentary Papers
How many people in Tasmania over the decade 1866 to 1875 were convicted of a crime, and how many were photographed? These tables from the Tasmanian Journals of the House of Assembly 1872-6 give the statistics for the Decennial Returns of persons dealt with by the Superior Courts (first table) and a Comparative Table showing the number of offences, apprehensions, convictions and acquittals for the years 1872, 1873, 1874 and 1875.

Are these crime statistics per capita excessive, compared with those of the other Australian colonies during the same period? Between 1868 and 1875, a total number of persons convicted in the Superior Courts was one thousand and eighty-eight (1,088). Contracted by the Attorney-General W. R. Giblin in February 1872, commercial photographer Thomas J. Nevin began the systematic photographic documentation of prisoners tried at the Supreme Court Hobart and committed at the adjoining Hobart Gaol, Campbell Street.

Further refining the time span when photography was introduced as a means of police surveillance: from 1871 to 1875, the total number of persons convicted in the Superior Courts totalled three hundred and forty-three (343). The mugshots of those who were photographed by T. J. Nevin in this last group of males - more than 300 - survive in public collections today for TWO principal reasons:

REASON ONE:
Proof that the 109 prisoners, who were sent to the Port Arthur prison after 1871 when the prison was transferred from Imperial funds to the Colonial government, had been sent back to Hobart by mid 1873. Proof was needed in order for the government to proceed with the closure of the Port Arthur site. This proof - in the form of criminal records carrying the identification photograph of the prisoner - was deemed necessary by the Legislative Council and Assembly in the face of the Attorney-General W.R. Giblin's attempt to forestall the closure of the Port Arthur prison on behalf of his brother-in-law Adolarious Humphrey Boyd, the incumbent Commandant there from 1871. Keeping the Port Arthur establishment operational would ensure that Boyd continued to enjoy his high salary, life of ease, power, position and social status. However, by December 1873, Boyd was forced to resign under allegations of nepotism and corruption directed at his brother-in-law, Attorney-General W. R. Giblin, in the Parliament. Giblin had been Nevin's family solicitor since 1868 when Nevin dissolved his business partnership with Robert Smith, and it was A-G W.R. Giblin who nominated Thomas J. Nevin for the job as one of only two local photographers, together with Samuel Clifford, who regularly provided photographic services to the legal fraternity. Samuel Clifford, for example, provided defence counsel John Woodcock Graves the younger with crime scene photographs taken on board the Western Empire as evidence of a mutiny in 1868.

As assurance to the Parliament, one hundred and nine (109) names of convicts (see list below) who were sent to Port Arthur from the Hobart Gaol from the year 1871 at the discretion of the Hobart Gaol Sheriff Thomas Reidy were officially tabled in Parliament on July 15th 1873 as soon as the resolution was passed in the House of Assembly to immediately close the prison at Port Arthur and transfer the prisoners there back to the Hobart Gaol. Thomas Nevin's earlier contract with the Lands and Survey Department dating from 1868 was extended to provide Parliament with their photographs.

Of those one hundred and nine (109) prisoners originally sent from the Hobart Gaol to Port Arthur after 1871 - the "Port Arthur convicts" as they became known in mid 20th century tourism discourse  - sixty (60) had already been transferred back to the Hobart Gaol by October 1873. On arrival and being "received" at the Hobart Gaol, they were photographed in standard issue prison clothing by T. J. Nevin. His photographs of a number of these transferred  prisoners taken in 1873 were duplicated and sent back to the Port Arthur prison administration during the last weeks of A. H. Boyd's incumbency as Commandant. Boyd was neither responsible nor personally involved for the production of prisoner mugshots for police and the judiciary at any time in his career as a civil servant.

Most but not all of the prisoners' names on that list, tabled in Parliament on 15th July 1873, tally with the names (and aliases) of the prisoners whose photographs survive in public collections, e.g. the names and "convict portraits" held at the National Library of Australia (84), most of which are the copies and exact duplicates of the same names of prisoner photographs held at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery (72), the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (56), the Mitchell Library SLNSW (13), and the State Library of Tasmania (10).

In summary, Thomas J. Nevin photographed the one hundred and nine (109) transferees from Port Arthur in 1873, some of whom had already been photographed on committal at the Hobart Gaol from February 1872 after their trial. Once arraigned, they were held in cells specifically designated for them while waiting to be sent to 60kms away to the Port Arthur prison. For many they were being sent back there as recidivists originally transported to Tasmania (VDL) prior to cessation in 1853. Out of the total number - three hundred and fort-three (343) photographed between 1872 and 1875, a few were females. Their "mugshots" apparently have not survived from those years. The remaining photographs, ca. three hundred (300) were copied with numbers used by archivists up to the number 322 at a later date for archival and commercial purposes (e.g. for sale at the exhibition in Sydney in conjunction with convictaria from the prison hulk Success, 1916), but in 1873 duplicates (as distinct from copies) of Nevin's originals were tabled and held in TREASURY, paid for out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund, from which Thomas Nevin received commission as the government contractor. Other duplicates - at least four and usually six printed from every glass negative - were held at the Hobart Gaol, and at the central registry in the Town Hall Municipal Police Office, while further duplicates were circulated to territorial and regional police on the prisoner's discharge on various conditions to work. Copies were also sent back to the prison at Port Arthur at the request of the assistant Colonial Secretary, B. Travers Solly in early January 1874.

REASON TWO:
Tourism, pure and simple. Commercial photographer John Watt Beattie was commissioned as government photographer in 1892 to provide tourist memorabilia of Tasmania's penal heritage, especially to intercolonial tourists in the hope they would visit Carnarvon, as the former Port Arthur prison site was renamed. Revamped at considerable cost, it was heavily promoted as Tasmania's premier tourist attraction (nothing's changed, it seems). John Watt Beattie salvaged Thomas J. Nevin's 1870s glass negatives, original uncut prints and prints in oval mounts of Tasmanian prisoners from a number of sources:

1. the Treasury where Attorney- General W. R. Giblin had tabled and paid for them;

2. the Sheriff's Office at the Hobart Gaol where old criminal records (rap sheets) carrying the pasted photograph remained intact;

3. the old photographer's room at the Hobart Gaol which was due for demolition in 1915;

4. the Municipal Police Office at the Hobart Town Hall where Thomas J. Nevin was Office-keeper of the criminal registers from 1875;

5. and from families, collectors, and auctions.

J. W. Beattie's collections were accessioned at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery on his death in 1930, and exhibited in Launceston in 1934. These are the sources of the extant prisoner photographs, mistakenly catalogued as "Convict portraits, Port Arthur 1874" in the years 1916, 1958, 1977, 1985 and 1991, when they were extensively copied and circulated to other national museums and libraries. Estrays (8-12) from a government source were donated to the National Library of Australia in 1964 by Dr. Neil Gunson . If Beattie had not salvaged them, these early photographs from the 1870s of Australian prisoners would not have survived as they do today in public collections.



Prisoner SMITH, William per Rodney 3
QVMAG Collection
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin 1874
Verso stamped with Nevin's Royal Arms government contractor stamp

One obvious question remains: where are the rest of the "mugshots" of all the other persons convicted, apprehended, tried, and acquitted in Tasmania during the Nevin brothers' involvement as police photographers? Constable John Nevin, Thomas Nevin's brother, was his assistant in the Hobart Gaol from the mid 1870s to the mid 1880s. There would have been at least a thousand, including duplicates, in existence by the late 1880s. The 1890s prisoner mugshots still intact, pasted to rap sheets, have survived, and are held at the Archives Office of Tasmania (See GD128 Photographic record and description of prisoners) but those from the Nevin brothers' active involvement were largely destroyed because they pictured men with the dreaded and shameful connection to Port Arthur. From historians such as Robson (1983) and Alexander (2010), it is clear that the "stain" of convict heritage was keenly felt by Tasmanians as the 20th century approached: the majority of these same mugshots from the 1870s and 1880s were burnt, destroyed and even smuggled to Melbourne to be auctioned privately. The Lyons government (1923-1928) was principally involved in their destruction.

Summary of Statistics
Source: Journals of the House of Assembly and Legislative Council 1875-6:

  • Four (4) persons were executed between 1868 and 1875. Thomas Nevin photographed Job Smith, executed in May 1875. Copies or duplicates of his photograph are held at the National Library of Australia and the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery.
  • Twenty one thousand, eight hundred and fifty six (21, 856) persons were tried in the Superior Courts between 1868 and 1875.
  • One thousand and eighty-eight (1,088) persons were convicted in the Superior Courts between 1868 and 1875.
  • Three hundred and forty-three (343) persons were convicted in the Superior Courts between 1871 and 1875, most of whom were PHOTOGRAPHED by T. J. Nevin from 1872 onwards.



Comparative table showing the number of offences etc
Source: Journals of the Tasmanian House of Assembly 1873-1875 (NLA, Microfilm)




Tasmanian crime statistics 1866-1875
Source: Journals of the Tasmanian House of Assembly 1873-1875 (NLA, Microfilm)




More detail: Tasmanian crime statistics 1866-1875
Source: Journals of the Tasmanian House of Assembly 1873-1875 (NLA Microfilm)




The list of 109 prisoners sent to Port Arthur from 1871 and tabled to return by October 1873 to the Hobart Gaol:



The list continued:
109 prisoners sent to Port Arthur from 1871 and tabled to return by October 1873 to the Hobart Gaol:



TRANSCRIPT
Will the Sheriff be good enough to inform me by what principle or rule he is guided in selecting Prisoners to be sent to Port Arthur?
F.M. INNES
10th June, [18]'73
_________________________
The transmission of Prisoners to Port Arthur is not regulated by any Executive rule, but the Sheriff in his discretion selects them from the following classes: -
1st. Men convicted before the Supreme Court.
2nd. Absconders from Gaols or Labour Gangs.
3rd. Men under Magisterial Sentences of 12 months and upwards.
4th. From men of the last class under shorter sentences if required to keep up the strength of the Establishment.
The Hon. F.M. INNES J. FORSTER
11 June, [18]'73.
__________________________

NOMINAL RETURN of all Prisoners sent to PORT ARTHUR since its transfer to the Colonial Government, showing their Ages, dates of Conviction, where Convicted, Crimes, and Sentences.
Names. Age. Date of Conviction Where Convicted. Crimes Sentences
Malden, Alfred
Duncan, Thomas
O'Brien, Michael
Ryan, Thomas
Williams, John
Smith, Samuel or Ketts
Glen, James
Pearce, John
Oakley, John
Willis, John
Appleby, John
Pender, Joseph
Evenden, John
Smith, Henry
Conningsby, Wllm
Conlan, James
Allen, Thomas
Green, William
Gregson, Francis
Gregson, John
Stewart, William
Johnson, George
Thomas, James
Murphy, Michael
Dunn, John
Simpson, James
Jeffrey, Mark
Aylward, Philip
Douglas, Robert or Welsh
Downes, Charles
White, John
Saunders, James
Simpson, Charles
Billington, William
Grant, Patrick
Harper, Thomas
Woodland, James
Wilson, George
Merchant, James
Adams, William
Fox, William
Bull, James
Box, Samuel
Saywood, Robert
Campbell, William alias Job Smith
Bright, William
Jones, John
Stewart, William
Atkinson, George
Power, Thomas
McCullum, Hugh [sic -McCallum]
Colhoun, James
Burns, Michael
Williams, Henry
Gangell, Jacob
Donovan, John
Kilpatrick, James
Mumford, William
Lewis, Henry
Phillips, Richard
Smith, John
Willis, Geo or Metcalfe
Kellow, William
Jones, William alias Jas. Brocklehurst
Byran, Matthew
Wamsley, joseph
Regan, John
Doran, Albert
Finley, John
Robinson, George
Cochrane, Moses
Carr, John
Carey, William
Fielding, Henry
Armstrong, Richard
McKay, Robert
Spencer, William
Williams, John
Smith, John alias Wm Orrin
Larkins, Stephen
Roberts, Henry
Morrison, William
Dean, Thomas
Quinn, James
Adamson, George
Smith, Alexander
Wiseman, Thomas
Simmonds, Edward
Swain, John
Brading, Robert
Blanchfield, Jas. W,
Langton, John
Dowd, Martin
Kilburn, John
Marsden, William
Brown, Henry
Pigott, Richard
Garfitt, Charles
Griffin, Thomas
Smith, John alias Marsh
Norris [Morris?], John
Newham, William
McDonald, Duncan
Theobald, Christopher
Triffit, Edward
Rowe (or Roe), John
Holdcroft, John
Steventon, Charles
____________

THOS.REIDY
H.M. Gaol, &c., for Males, Hobart, 9th June , 1873
The Assistant Colonial Secretary Secretary
JAMES BARNARD
GOVERNMENT PRINTER, TASMANIA
The Hon. W. R. GIBLIN'S RESPONSE: the 60 prisoners returned to Hobart before July 15, 1873:



TRANSCRIPT
Mr. Gray asked the Honorable the Attorney-General if it is the intention of Government to comply with and carry out the Resolution of this House of 24th June last as to the Port Arthur Establishments.

Mr. Attorney-General replied: - It is. Sixty Prisoners have already been removed to Hobart Town; and it is intended to proceed with their removal as soon as arrangements for the proper custody and control of the Prisoners can be made on the Main Land [i.e. at the Hobart Gaol].



Hon. William Robert Giblin, Tasmanian Attorney-General and Premier
Photo by Thomas J. Nevin 1874.
Verso with T. Nevin stamp
TAHO Collection Ref: NS 1013/1971



The Hon. W. R. Giblin ca. 1880
Tasmanian Attorney-General and Premier
In J. W. Beattie's Album, Members of the Tasmanian Parliament 1900
Photo KLW NFC 2014. TAHO Collection.



Order to table expenses spent on repairs at Port Arthur,
Journals of the House of Assembly July 1873 (NLA, Microfilm)


Prisoners at Port Arthur, Tasmania, 1870
This list of prisoners under sentence and funded as Colonial convicts (as distinct from Imperial funded convict) was submitted to the Tasmanian Parliament by James Boyd, Civil Commandant, Port Arthur (not to be confused with his successor A. H. Boyd), on 30th September 1870.

Convicts. Paupers and Lunatics at Port Arthur Return to an Order of the House dated 8th September 1870 (Mr. C. Meredith)
Laid upon the Table by the Colonial Treasurer,
and ordered by the House to be printed October 13, 1870
Source: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/PPWeb/1870/HA1870pp128.pdf



Cover and pages 3-7



Pages 6 and 7



Source: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/PPWeb/1870/HA1870pp128.pdf

Prisoners at the Hobart Gaol, Tasmania, 1874-75
This is the document which provides the most interesting evidence of where those prisoners whose mugshots have survived were employed when officially listed as inmates of the Gaol and House of Corrections for Males, Hobart Town during the years 1873 and 1874. There are several dozen names of prisoners in this list whose mugshots are currently extant that were taken by Thomas J. Nevin at the Supreme Court and Hobart Gaol while these men were still under remand or sentence at Hobart, especially those with longer sentences processed in 1873 and earlier. Most of these prisoners would have been photographed, their mugshots discarded, lost, stolen or destroyed. Those which are extant can be found on this site. To find the photograph and more details of prisoners’ criminal careers on this list, use this site’s Complete Archive on front page, and Search Box in sidebar.

Try these Rogues Galleries in the first instance.

(No.49) 1875.
TASMANIA.
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY.
PENAL DISCIPLINE.
REPORT OF COMMISSION. Laid upon the Table by the Attorney-General, and ordered by the House to be printed, August 10, 1875.

List of offences of male prisoners, Hobart Gaol, December 1874: Superior Courts



List of offences of male prisoners, Hobart Gaol, December 1874: Inferior Courts



Pages 3 and 4



Pages 5 and 6



Page 7


(No.49) 1875.
TASMANIA.
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY.
PENAL DISCIPLINE. REPORT OF COMMISSION.
Laid upon the Table by the Attorney-General, and ordered by the House to be printed, August 10, 1875.
Source: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/PPWeb/1875/HA1875pp49.pdf

Last of the transferees to Hobart 1875-1876
Most telling in these last two lists are the names of prisoners whose mugshots were accessioned to public collections at the National Library of Australia (NLA), the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG), the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery (QVMAG), and the Archives Office of Tasmania (AOT) in the 20th century. Thomas J. Nevin was the first and only commercial photographer who was contracted by Attorney-General W. R. Giblin in early 1873 to provide Parliament with prints from his original negatives taken of prisoners at the Hobart Gaol and still the only fully contracted photographer by December 1875. In January 1876 he was appointed to the civil service as Office and Hall keeper of the Hobart Town Hall for the Hobart City Corporation, with duties as photographer for the Municipal Police Office housed within the Town Hall. There is no clearer evidence that these lists of prisoners' names and their mugshots which were produced for the Hon. W. R. Giblin by Thomas J. Nevin and tabled in both Houses in 1875 and 1876, are the lists used by John Watt Beattie et al in the 1890s to the early 1920s to make a selection for sale to visitors at his "Port Arthur Museum" located in Hobart, and for inclusion on travelling intercolonial exhibitions associated with the fake prison ship Success. They reprinted and inscribed more than 300 of these prisoner cdv's  verso with the patently incorrect phrase "Taken at Port Arthur 1874" under the prisoner's name and ship on which he was transported. Those cdv's were housed in family albums in alphabetical order as a convenient way for visitors seeking images of their criminal ancestors.

1875



Penal Discipline Report of Commission (House of Assembly)
https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/31035/ha1875pp49.pdf

1876



Gaol for Males, Campbell-Street, Hobart Town: report for 1875 (Legislative Council)
https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/31599/lc1876pp47.pdf

Articles posted here relating to these prisoners' names with their photographs:

CONOLLY, James
https://prisonerpics.blogspot.com/2015/05/hobart-gaol-camera-and-mugshot-books_23.html

DOGHERTY, Denis
https://prisonerpics.blogspot.com/2007/09/anthony-trollope-port-arthur_14.html

GILMORE, Michael or Terence MOORE
https://thomasnevin.com/2009/01/19/gilmore-micheal-alias-terence-moore/

HARPER, Thomas
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2020/05/t-j-nevins-1870s-mugshots-inspiration.html

HAYES, William
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2009/04/hayes-william-2.html

LEATHLEY, George
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2008/01/george-leathley-no-226.html

MURPHY, Michael
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2007/04/parkhurst-boys-on-board-fairlie-1852.html

RYAN, William
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2015/07/prisoner-william-ryan-wholesale-forger.html

ROSETTA, Charles
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2010/01/convict-wm-meaghers-original-by-nevin.html

SMITH, Henry
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2007/04/how-misattribution-can-persist.html

WALMSLEY, Joseph
https://prisonerpics.blogspot.com/2021/02/prisoner-joseph-walmsley-1842-1891.html

WILLIS, George.
https://tasmanianphotographer.blogspot.com/2016/01/sideshow-alley-thomas-nevin-at-npg-2015.html